Home

 Book
Award


Submission Guidelines

Order & Subscribe

Support

Links

Contact




Modesto Junior College Department of English
435 College Ave.
Modesto, CA 95350 ISSN: 1543-4532

Current Issue         Back Issues        Book Series

Editor's Note, Quercus Review # 6,
by Sam Pierstorff

(Difficulty is Not a Prerequisite)

If there were a buzz word to label my favorite poetry of this millennium, it would have to be "accessible," a word that is often confused with its ugly cousin, "simple." These are not synonyms, of course. "Accessible" means the poem tickles before it punches, laughs before it brings you to your knees in tears. "An accessible poem, "Billy Collins writes, "has a clear entrance, a front door through which the reader may pass into the body of the poem . . . " (xiv). Subtlety, imagery, and playful yet precise language are all characteristics found inside, but clarity and understanding are the docents. Abstractions, opaqueness, and difficulty are, quite simply, uninvited guests.

"Accessible" poetry can be misleading. To some critics, it is easy, monotonous drivel written in plain language and choppy prose. To some readers or would-be poets, it is a license to say any damn thing and call it a poem. What is not recognized so quickly, however, is that the best "accessible" poets always make it look easy—the way Michael Jordan made walking on air seem possible—when, in fact, their talents are in their deceptive simplicity. Their poems possess a kind of clarity and grace that invite new readers to listen at the doors of poetry, which have been bolted shut for centuries—and beneath that apparent ease is always a transcendent theme or idea that sneaks up on readers like laughter at a funeral. We don’t think it should be there, though it is—and we are secretly very glad to be able to finally understand and enjoy what we’ve read.

So when William Logan writes in Poetry magazine that "The best poetry has often been difficult, has often been so obscure that readers have fought passionately over it" (413), I can’t help but vomit a little in my mouth. "Best" is completely subjective, of course; however, I have seldom fought with my brethren over a poem’s obscurity. Imagine the tug-of-war: "I love that I totally don’t get this poem." "No, I love it more because I understand it even less!"

Logan means well and I won’t begin to tackle his bruising intellect and understanding of poetry with my flabby mind and foolish sarcasm, but to say that "The beauty of poetry is in the difficulty, in the refusal of the words to make the plain sense immediately plain . . . " (414) I am forced now to take a shot of Pepto-Bismol. I am overcome with the fear that poetry will slowly crawl back into the damp closet of the academy where the "best" poetry is defined by the most obscure—where the sun never shines and where people never enter, except to retrieve, perhaps, that ancient pair of shoes that hardly fits anymore.

I want poetry to live in the real world, to remain outside where people can see it and hear it. I want it to stay open all night long like a drugstore—not for junkies, but for people like me and you who need a clean, clear and accessible shot of verse once in a while to make the day seem a little lighter, not darker— and certainly not more difficult.



 

Works Cited

Collins, Billy. "Introduction." 180 More: Extraordinary Poems for Every Day. Ed. Billy Collins.
     New York: Random House, 2005. xiii-xxiii.

Logan, William. "The Bowl of Diogenes." Poetry 187.5 (2006): 406-415.

 

(back)

Home / Current Issue / Back Issues / Book Series / Support / Book Award / Submit / Order / Links